SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote:
Joey Deacon wrote:
It is only implied by you, which would suggest it is you with the issue.

Do you need to be inspired by a person in your choosen field then?

What a bizarre world you live in.
My point entirely. You disingenuously take my reluctance to be 'inspired' by the disabled running around a track as automatically meaning I must have issues with the disabled.

Frankly, that's just a cheap and pathetic way of attempting to win the argument by attacking the person making the argument, not the argument itself.

I'm not particularly inspired by catholics eating ham sandwiches, Welshmen playing the violin, ginger people playing golf, accountants, thoroughbred race-horses, carrots, the Woolwich Ferry or washing-machines. I don't have issues with any of them. Or perhaps I do?

What a rotter I must be.




It wasn't your reluctance to be inspired though was it, it was the fact you likened it to a freak show and assumed we all looked down at them.

No it wasn't, see above, you have lost track of your own argument.

Why would you be? What a ridiculous point you are trying to make.

Not a rotter, you are just making a bit of a fool of yourself.