SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote:
Fred's last point is the clincher.

I'm not suggesting for a moment that the Tour or any other sporting event is 100% clean. Just that to automatically suspect the winner as being a doper may, at last, be unfair.

Incidentally, most of the recent doping scandals in cycling have concerned events which took place in the past.
In para order.

Thank you.

Spot on, to the word, especially "to automatically suspect the winner as being a doper may, at last, be unfair."  That is all I am saying.  I am not saying Wiggins is clean, I don't know.  I'm not saying that there are not lots of undetected cheats, I don't know.  But I am saying that we can at last believe that there is a reasonable if not better chance that the top riders are clean.

Yes.